Mark,
I think the agenda covers the right
topics, but its very ambitious given the stage we are at. Especially ambitious
is the way you put ”Agreement” down after fifteen minutes. J ) I think realistically we
can unify the outputs of the last meeting, position our initiative relative to
other standards and projects in the field, and identify some “ext action”
that we can get stuck into between now and the June meeting. If we achieve that
next week, the April newsletter will engage people’s energy and we can
get the whole Kendra community to start posting use cases, stakeholder analysis
etc. Is that helpful?
Gordon
From: owner-k-summit@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-k-summit@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Mark Stuart
Sent: 29 March 2007 12:26
To: k-summit@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [kSum] Mark Stuart's
draft agenda for April 2...
Daniel,
You have hit on a point I had forgotten about - namely the facilitating our US colleagues
joining. I need to review the agenda in light of this and your other comments
and shift some of the intended topics - stakeholder / use cases analysis to the
July meeting. It makes sense given the time limitations.
I shall review the agenda on the Wiki at the earliest opportunity.
Regards,
Mark.
On 3/27/07, Daniel
Harris <
daniel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Mark's struck a good
balance. There always needs to be an equal emphasis on doing what is necessary
to make the Kendra vision come to reality and on defining what Kendra is.
Kendra is "what ever it takes" to bring the vision to reality. The
vision is set. We've just got to keep on doing the necessaries.
Wasn't this meeting called to discuss Summit2 at the end of June? Which day:
27, 28 or 29? Where? Who to invite? Agenda for the day? That information was
then going in the newsletter on the April 4, yes? And so people would be given
a good amount of notice, yes?
Didn't we decide that this meeting would be in the afternoon (I wrote down 1430
to 1700 in my diary) to facilitate our US colleagues joining in with the
video/audio/web conference?
We should also review Gordon's cross-media metadata questions that should have
got asked at the Summit:
http://www.kendra.org.uk/lists/archive/k-events/msg00037.html
What else?
Cheers Daniel
On 27/03/2007 09:45, Daniel Harris wrote:
> http://www.kendra.org.uk/wiki/wiki.pl?KendraMeeting20070402