[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: [kSum] Newsletter fore or aft April 2 webcast meeting?...
Please take me off this list
Thanks
Jonathan Williams
Jonathan Williams
Senior Account Manager
Political Intelligence
T: +44 (0)20 7233 7377
23 Palace Street
London SW1E 5HW
Registration Number: 3108255 Place of Registration: England.
The information in this e-mail and in any attachments is confidential
and may be legally privileged. It is intended solely for the addressee
or addressees. If you are not an intended recipient, please delete the
message and any attachments and notify the sender of any misdelivery:
any use or disclosure of the contents of either is unauthorised and may
be unlawful. Any views expressed in this message are those of the
individual sender, except where the sender states them, with requisite
authority, to be those of Political Intelligence.
-----Original Message-----
From: owner-k-summit@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:owner-k-summit@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Deborah Sass
Sent: 20 March 2007 17:00
To: k-summit@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: RE: [kSum] Newsletter fore or aft April 2 webcast meeting?...
Boardroom booked for 2nd April (agenda to follow) for any one who wants
to attend in person- our office is two mins fro Old Street station
Deborah Sass
Head of Client Services and Business Development - Europe
Muze Europe
Paulton House
8 Shepherdess Walk
London N1 7LB
Cellular: +44(0)77666 30905
Direct:+44 (0)20 7566 8229
Main: +44 (0)20 7566 8216
Fax: +44 (0)20 7566 8259
www.muzeeurope.com
www.searchmuze.co.uk
P Please consider the environment - do you really need to print this
email?
Registered Office: Paulton House, 8 Shepherdess Walk, <?xml:namespace
prefix = st1 ns = "urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:smarttags" />London
N1 7LB.
Company Registration number: 4790556GB This email and its attachments
may be confidential and are intended solely for the use of the
individual to whom it is addressed. Any views or opinions expressed are
solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of
Wilmington Group plc.
If you are not the intended recipient of this email and its attachments,
you must take no action based upon them, nor must you copy or show them
to anyone. Please contact the sender if you believe you have received
this email in error.
-----Original Message-----
From: owner-k-summit@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:owner-k-summit@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx]On Behalf Of JG Rae
Sent: 20 March 2007 15:25
To: k-summit@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: RE: [kSum] Newsletter fore or aft April 2 webcast meeting?...
Mark's suggestion is a step in the right direction for me.
Looking at the minutes, I see considerable common ground between the
three teams, and a couple of mistakes.
Common ground:
1) All three teams focused on activity (people wanting to do things with
content) supported by methods and tools.
2) Access, Find, Link : 3 teams, 3 verbs, but am I right in thinking we
are all looking at the consumer rather than producer ? Not necessarily
the end consumer, it could also be repackagers / compilers / remixers
/editors authors taking someone else's content as their input.
3) commercial and non-commercial services (don't assume one business
model works for everybody)
4) interoperability and respect for other standards initiatives
This all seems pretty positive IMHO
Mistakes (maybe mine):
Bob wrote down something I didn't actually say, but I agree with it
anyway!
* Link people to people via content
* Link content to content via people
* Link people to content via people
Any combination of the three has meaning, I'd suggest.
I don't remember anyone making the point in italics " Note: Kendra
should not define a new metadata standard, translation or toolset." I
remember saying that other metadata standards exist, and we should love
them and interoperate with them and not duplicate their good work....
My two cents worth:
1) Since we seem to be focusing on activity, I'd like people to come up
with some ideas about "things we want to do that better meta data /
tools / whatever would help us with"!
2) The search / find / link perspective means there is a niche in which
expect to complement existing standards. I remember Daniel's example
("make it easy to find what I know I want") and Anthony's ("allow me to
discover things I had no idea existed".)
3) Let's be agnostic, or open to different interpretations of, "who
pays"
and "who wants / needs to be paid". A good example for me is Muze, which
does something of great value to labels, but doesn't take revenue from
the labels.
4) see my comments under 2.
Best wishes to all,
Gordon Rae
-----Original Message-----
From: owner-k-summit@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:owner-k-summit@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Daniel Harris
Sent: 19 March 2007 20:25
To: k-summit@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [kSum] Newsletter fore or aft April 2 webcast meeting?...
On 19/03/2007 10:08, Mark_Stuart@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
> I am happy to propose an agenda before the end of this week based on
> the minutes from the last meeting (or Wiki content) + some additional
> ideas I have. People can then submit any changes/additions and we can
> finalise the agenda around the middle of next week.
>
> How does that sound?
Sounds great. Feel free to update and create new wiki pages as you see
fit - collaboration is the name of the game. That goes for everyone here
too.
Cheers Daniel
______________________________________________________________________
This email has been scanned by the MessageLabs Email Security System.
For more information please visit http://www.messagelabs.com/email
______________________________________________________________________