[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re[4]: [kDev] Which software license? A way forward...

To: "Dave Cridland [Home]" <k-developers@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re[4]: [kDev] Which software license? A way forward...
From: Phillip Temple <ptemple@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 7 Jun 2004 16:12:16 +0200
Delivered-to: <k-developers@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
In-reply-to: <20040607135619.17778.24986.polymer@turner>
Organization: Progressive Publishing
References: <3DF6943D-B638-11D8-829C-000393CD6A62@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> <50DF3DA0-B86E-11D8-A778-000393CD6A62@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> <18412107359.20040607130858@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20040607135619.17778.24986.polymer@turner>
Reply-to: k-developers@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Sender: owner-k-developers@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

Hello Dave,

DCH> Phillip, does this fit with your thoughts?

Spot on.

Phillip.

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Re[4]: [kDev] Which software license? A way forward...
  - From: Kyrian

References:
- [kDev] Which software license? A way forward...
  - From: Daniel Harris
- Re: [kDev] Which software license? A way forward...
  - From: Daniel Harris
- Re[2]: [kDev] Which software license? A way forward...
  - From: Phillip Temple
- Re: Re[2]: [kDev] Which software license? A way forward...
  - From: Dave Cridland [Home]

Prev by Date: Re: Re[2]: [kDev] Which software license? A way forward...
Next by Date: Re: Re[2]: [kDev] Which software license? A way forward...
Previous by thread: Re: Re[2]: [kDev] Which software license? A way forward...
Next by thread: Re: Re[4]: [kDev] Which software license? A way forward...
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread