[
Date Prev
][
Date Next
][
Thread Prev
][
Thread Next
][
Date Index
][
Thread Index
]
Re[4]: [kDev] Which software license? A way forward...
To
: "Dave Cridland [Home]" <
k-developers@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>
Subject
: Re[4]: [kDev] Which software license? A way forward...
From
: Phillip Temple <
ptemple@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>
Date
: Mon, 7 Jun 2004 16:12:16 +0200
Delivered-to
: <
k-developers@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>
In-reply-to
: <
20040607135619.17778.24986.polymer@turner
>
Organization
: Progressive Publishing
References
: <
3DF6943D-B638-11D8-829C-000393CD6A62@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> <
50DF3DA0-B86E-11D8-A778-000393CD6A62@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> <
18412107359.20040607130858@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> <
20040607135619.17778.24986.polymer@turner
>
Reply-to
:
k-developers@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Sender
:
owner-k-developers@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Hello Dave, DCH> Phillip, does this fit with your thoughts? Spot on. Phillip.
Follow-Ups
:
Re: Re[4]: [kDev] Which software license? A way forward...
From:
Kyrian
References
:
[kDev] Which software license? A way forward...
From:
Daniel Harris
Re: [kDev] Which software license? A way forward...
From:
Daniel Harris
Re[2]: [kDev] Which software license? A way forward...
From:
Phillip Temple
Re: Re[2]: [kDev] Which software license? A way forward...
From:
Dave Cridland [Home]
Prev by Date:
Re: Re[2]: [kDev] Which software license? A way forward...
Next by Date:
Re: Re[2]: [kDev] Which software license? A way forward...
Previous by thread:
Re: Re[2]: [kDev] Which software license? A way forward...
Next by thread:
Re: Re[4]: [kDev] Which software license? A way forward...
Index(es):
Date
Thread