Re: [kDev] kendraTools test 1...

[Daniel Harris <daniel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Hi All,

I'm getting really buzzed on the kendraTools test. It's getting fun. 
It's great that people have tried it out. I see Neil's been there.

But now I'm thinking how to take it further. My immediate desire was to 
comment on the relationships. What that means is include the complete 
relationship (Object|Link|Object) as an object in itself that can then 
be included in another relationship. For example:

(pigs really fly | is a | false statement) | given | current 
understanding

and

(animals | can mean | Ireland) | really | doesn't make sense

And it would be neat if this could work recursively so one could 
continue to nest objects. Hmmmm... the code is on display here:
http://www.kendra.org.uk/develop-code.php
... if anyone's after a headache!

I'm not exactly sure where this is going but call it a bit of 
kendraFun! ;-)

Cheers Daniel

On Monday, January 27, 2003, at 01:57  pm, Daniel Harris wrote:
> http://www.kendra.org.uk/tools1/